A Leader A Machiavellian Leader - 1141 Words

The Philippines does not need a perfect Machiavellian leader in the present. I believe a great leader would be opposite of that of a Machiavellian leader. I also believe that a prominent leader would have good morals and ideal principles. A Machiavellian leader could care less about his/her citizens, since his only two options when governing states are either benevolence or destruction. He/She only cares about his/her state, which is ill-advised, since a leader cannot lead without the people’s approval or acceptance. However, our current leader encompasses numerous traits of that of a Machiavellian leader, which can be easily acceptable. As can be heard from his speeches, the president is self-reliant – which is the primary virtue of Machiavellianism. He manages to gain power by relying on his own prowess and the loyalty of thousands of police in the country through his numerous deeds. According to Machiavelli, this will lead to better decision-making and problem solving skills, which will then lead to great success. The Philippines has undergone a lot of changes ever since we Filipinos elected our current president, Rodrigo Duterte, last May – truly heeding the agenda of Duterte’s administration, which is â€Å"change.† Some changes can be considered as outstanding, while most of them are undeniably terrible or even controversial. One of the situations that stands out is the hundreds of dead alleged drug addicts/pushers/lords murdered on the streets by unknown vigilantes andShow MoreRelated George Bush as a Machiavellian Leader Essay1428 Words   |  6 PagesGeorge Bush as a Machiavellian Leader George Bush and Niccolo Machiavelli are two very influential political figures that share some similar ideals. Machiavellis work was never intended to be applied to republics, or a democratic government. The advice written in The Prince would have likely been applied in the time of absolute government, when countries were ruled by one leader. It is a work which, as Machiavelli himself says that his philosophy is only applied to principalities, or whatRead MoreMachiavelli’s The Prince: Examples of Machiavellian Leaders Essay2048 Words   |  9 PagesArguably, the most Machiavellian leader to ever exist would be Joseph Stalin. He abided by three major Machiavellian methods that were stated in the Prince: the ends justifies the means, crush any opposition, and displaying a false character. Stalin had a plan for Russia and did everything in his power to achieve that plan. He wanted to transform Russia into a industrial superpower, a military superpower, and a political superpow er. To achieve his goals he committed many horrible crimes againstRead MoreNiccolo Machiavellis The Prince and Shakespeares Julius Caesar958 Words   |  4 Pageslessons idealistic and unrealistic for leaders. Machiavelli wrote his book, The Prince, to show the ruling Meddici family that the world is not a fairy tale. Prior to Machiavelli writing The Prince, the majority of books depicted people as virtuous and ethical. However, The Prince is not the only work of literature that manifests Machiavellian techniques. William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar utilizes similar methods. As shown in Julius Caesar and The Prince, a leader who follows Machiavelli’s advice willRead MoreRichard Of Richard As A Machiavellian Character819 Words   |  4 PagesGloucester is perhaps the epitome of a Machiavellian character. According to the lectures, a Machiavellian leader is one that supports deceit, killing, and genocide in order to defeat enemies. Does this not scream Richard? On man y accounts throughout the play, Richard displays a blatant disregard for morality as a ruler in addition to intense manipulations of the people surrounding him. I think one of the most significant examples of Richard’s Machiavellian tendencies is his response immediatelyRead MoreMachiavelli s The Prince 850 Words   |  4 PagesHistory s most prominent leaders have shown extreme congruence. These leaders almost always hold reality over ethics. How can we classify lying and manipulative leaders as immoral when their duplicity is the very reason a society can maintain stability? This idea has of means justifying the ends has been a staple in History s most prosperous of societies. Machiavelli s novel The Prince was the first stab at understanding this human tendency of what is now known as Machiavellian. Machiavelli graspedRead MoreSocrates And Machiavelli Analysis936 Words   |  4 Pagesas a means to bring them to higher points of understanding and critical examination, wh ich they then were to apply to their own society. He wanted people to live lives as they ought to live them and for the state to be a reflection of that aim. The leader advocated by Machiavelli, The Prince, is far more authoritarian and holds entirely different values in comparison to Socrates. The Prince is an individual who maintains complete hegemony over his subjects through nearly any means. The Prince willRead MoreMachiavellian Prince Analysis1688 Words   |  7 Pagesand wisdom above all else, and would find Machiavelli’s concept of a prince to be a leader void of these qualities. Socrates would be critical of a Machiavellian prince’s character and actions for failing to meet his morally absolute standard of goodness, and of the Machiavellian prince’s notion of wisdom for conflicting with his own. Socrates would not be supportive of the political system formed under a Machiavellian prince, the perpetuation of which inherently clashes with his stringent m oral absolutismRead MoreMachiavellian Leadership : The Prince1285 Words   |  6 PagesMachiavellian Leadership: Are These Principles Morally Correct to Use Today? For centuries, the political principles brought forth through Nicolà ² Machiavelli in his writing, The Prince, have been quite controversial both on the political forefront and the mainstream of leadership training. Though most people do not know that they are fighting battles over the principles brought about in the writing of Machiavelli. The Prince was written in the years following Machiavelli’s time in the politicalRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Julius Caesar Essay1609 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"bad judge of character† (Shanzer 1). Although both critics’ descriptions of Brutus have merit, Brutus’ shortcoming, as well as the success of the opposing leader, Mark Antony, is more accurately explained using the observations of Niccolo Machiavelli in The Prince. In this book Machiavelli outlines the characteristics of a successful leader. When using The Prince as a lens to read Julius Caesar, the correlation between a leader’s Machiavellianism a nd their success becomes very apparent. MarcusRead MoreAnalysis Of The Prince By Niccolo Machiavelli1094 Words   |  5 Pagesrequirements to be a successful leader over a powerful state. He suggests numerous times that a prince should govern an empire with a image that is dominant but caring for citizens while ruling ruthlessly and appealing to the people if possible. Machiavelli’s principles of a dominant and ruthless prince may not be globally accepted but they are efficient and accurate despite the lack in thought of morality and ethics. Machiavelli gives numerous examples of how a leader should carry themselves and